Lately I haven't had a lot to say about much of anything, but I do have a few short things to say, so I've gathered them all into one post:
1) Wikimapia is about 6,000 times as much fun to edit as wikipedia. I'm quite proud of the fact that I have made a significant contribution to the world's knowledge of southeastern Wyoming geography.
2) If a recipe ever advises you to "wrap the cinnamon sticks, cloves, and the remaining bay leave in cheesecloth and tie it with a string to create a spice bag," ignore it. Who's got cheesecloth and string in their kitchen? Now, if you're like me, you've probably got coffee filters and a stapler. Yeah, it totally works.
3) According to my little sister (who is a manager at a 2700-sow commercial hog farm) there is a foolproof way for spotting the illegal aliens. 1) They have a really, really Anglophone a name but barely speak English and 2) they frequently misspell their name. This actually happens. (Alternative method: they tell you about walking from Guatemala and going three days without water.) She says that HR sends them the workers and the managers are just expected to manage and not question their workers' status. That's some courageous corporate leadership - "We can't compete because everyone else uses illegals; so the corporate strategy committee has come up with a plan we call 'taking the low road.'"
It's not that I dislike immigration. I actually think that we need to liberalize immigration AND step up enforcement at the same time. It's not fair to companies that actually care about not contributing to organized identity thefts rings.
Corporation - "We need these workers! No Americans will take these jobs because they're hard/dangerous/mind-numbingly boring/in rural Oklahoma!"
Rational Individual - "Actually, what you mean is that no American will take that job for the wages you offer, the problem is that you need to raise wages."
Corporation - "We pay a competitive wage compared to our industry."
Rational Individual - "But you admit your entire industry can't find enough legal employees. Maybe you all need to raise wages."
Corporation - "That would raise expenses! We're in a low-margin business!"
Rational Individual - "Then perhaps you need to raise prices or become more efficient."
Corporation - "We can't raise prices! We're a commodity item! And we've already pressed efficiency as far as we can!"
Rational Individual - "Well, then here's what I suggest you do: go out of business. You're a net welfare loss to society. You're missing the point of capitalism - crappy enterprises fail. If you can't succeed within the rules, then admit that you suck and get on with life."
Corporation - "But think of the workers that would lose their jobs!"
The conversation ends there because the Rational Individual has given up on the Corporation and is off to efficiently allocate some capital.
Let's be clear here, I don't hate corporations. I hate whiny corporations that won't admit that they're bad at their business and instead of spending money fixing their problems, they spend money on lobbying politicians to tilt the playing field towards them.
Here's a handy reminder for business people out there thinking about investing in lobbyists: government is society's overhead cost. You hate overhead costs, right? So stop giving money to lobbyists and political action committees. Just because it's an industry standard doesn't make it a good idea.
4) Paolo Nutini is pretty good. My roommate discovered him through iTunes free song of the day. Paolo Nutini is not Italian. He is not related to Nutella. He's actually Scottish and a pretty good singer. I'm a big fan of the title track of his debut album - "these streets." I am kind of freaked out by the fact that he was only 19 when this album was recorded, but I'll still recommend it.
5) And finally, an item that I know my friend is probably already complaining about in his blog - Baltimore passed a city-wide smoking ban in public places! I, on the other hand, am psyched. I love breathing non-carcinogenic air and yes, I do believe that it jives with a libertarian/classic liberal viewpoint. It's okay to have the government regulate to keep people from hurting other people. Second-hand smoke hurts other people. Only 10 months until the ban takes effect!
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Ooh, I'm being baited! Well, rather than providing another well researched, carefully considered argument weighing personal freedoms against the right to be free of the unwanted imposition by others and the relative merits of an economic solution versus a legislative solution, I'm simply going to point out that there is no evidence to suggest that secondhand smoke adversely affects mortality . That's right, folks, second hand smoke is no more real than global warming :-)
Also, I'm with you on the whole illegal immigration thing. Why does everyone hate immigrants so much? It's gone beyond simple racism and economic protectionism to the point where it's become an almost purely emotional issue.
I suppose that the argument that some people have asthma or are allergic to smoking will do nothing to dissuade you of your position?
Did you read my post? The tobacco companies have found literally dozens of researchers who care more about money than their professional integrity or even the health and well-being of the American public, and these researchers have amassed a huge amount of data that clearly shows, provided that you squint a little and don't read the "Methods" section too closely, that second-hand smoke isn't bad for you. I'm guessing that with a little bit more research, they can banish these myths of "asthma" and "allergies" into the same dustbin of failed pseudo-scientific fraud as "evolution." Even if these so-called "medical conditions" are somehow real, I'm sure that cigarette smoke is no more of an irritant than asbestos or dioxins.
Post a Comment